Contact

A low purchase price does not automatically lead to the lowest TCO calculation, because the true cost of a packaging solution only becomes clear over its full lifecycle. Maintenance, repairs, replacement, product damage, and logistical inefficiencies all add up and can quickly make a cheap option more expensive than a high-quality investment. In this article, we answer the most frequently asked questions about TCO in industrial packaging.

What costs does a TCO calculation include beyond the purchase price?

A TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) calculation includes all costs a packaging solution incurs throughout its entire lifecycle. In addition to the purchase price, this covers costs related to use, maintenance, storage, logistics, repair, replacement, and eventual disposal. For industrial packaging, these hidden costs can far exceed the initial purchase price.

Specifically, a complete TCO calculation for packaging includes the following cost categories:

  • Acquisition costs: the direct price of the packaging itself
  • Usage costs: time and labor for packing, unpacking, and processing
  • Maintenance costs: inspection, cleaning, and periodic repair
  • Repair costs: restoration after damage during transport or storage
  • Replacement costs: how quickly does the packaging need to be replaced?
  • Logistics costs: weight, volume, and return flows affect transportation costs
  • Damage claims: costs resulting from damaged products when packaging falls short
  • Disposal costs: processing or recycling at the end of the packaging’s lifespan

In sectors such as high-tech, medical, and defense, the damage claims category carries particular weight. A damaged medical device or a defective high-tech component can result in costs that far exceed the purchase price of the packaging many times over. A TCO calculation makes all these hidden costs visible, providing an honest picture of the true investment.

Why do cheap packaging solutions often end up costing more?

Cheap packaging tends to cost more in the long run because it typically has a shorter lifespan, offers less protection, and generates higher indirect costs. A low purchase price often comes with inferior materials, less precise dimensions, and limited protection against shocks, vibrations, or moisture. The result is more damage, a higher replacement frequency, and increased logistics costs.

In practice, this pattern repeats itself consistently. A cheap, off-the-shelf package that does not fit precisely requires additional filler material or supplementary protection — adding labor time to every shipment. Moreover, cheaper packaging is often designed for single use, meaning you repurchase it with every cycle. Over ten shipments, you pay the purchase price ten times over, whereas a durable, reusable package — despite a higher initial investment — structurally costs less per use.

Indirect damage costs also play a significant role. If a component worth several thousand dollars arrives damaged because the packaging provided insufficient cushioning, the costs of replacement, delays, and reputational damage will far outweigh any savings from choosing cheaper packaging. For companies shipping sensitive equipment or critical components, this is not a theoretical risk — it is a real operational expense.

How does reusability affect total packaging costs?

Reusability significantly reduces total packaging costs by spreading the purchase price across multiple use cycles. The more often a package is reused, the lower the cost per use becomes. For industrial packaging used dozens or even hundreds of times, the cost per cycle drops to a fraction of the initial investment.

The impact of reusability on the TCO calculation operates on several levels:

  • Lower cost per use: a package costing one hundred dollars that lasts fifty uses costs two dollars per use; a twenty-dollar single-use package costs twenty dollars per use
  • Less purchasing and administration: fewer ordering cycles mean less procurement time and fewer logistical transactions
  • Lower disposal costs: fewer disposable packages means less waste and lower processing costs
  • Sustainability gains: reuse reduces material consumption and the carbon footprint of the packaging chain

Reusable packaging does require a well-organized return logistics system to fully realize these benefits. If packages are not systematically retrieved, cleaned, and inspected, part of the cost savings will be lost. A structured management process is therefore a prerequisite for achieving the optimal TCO of reusable industrial packaging.

What is the difference between TCO and ROI in packaging decisions?

TCO measures all costs a packaging solution incurs over its lifespan, while ROI (Return on Investment) compares the returns and savings against the investment. TCO answers the question “what does this really cost?”, while ROI answers “what does this deliver relative to what I invest?”.

In packaging decisions, both calculations complement each other. The TCO calculation reveals which option costs the least over the long term. The ROI calculation quantifies what better packaging delivers: fewer damage claims, higher productivity through faster packing and unpacking, less downtime due to damaged shipments, and lower transportation costs through more efficient use of loading space.

A concrete example: a custom package for a medical device costs more than a standard solution. The TCO calculation shows that the custom solution is cheaper over three years due to fewer replacements and zero damage claims. The ROI calculation adds that time savings during packing and avoided downtime from damaged deliveries recover the investment within eighteen months. Together, TCO and ROI provide a complete financial picture of the packaging decision.

When does a higher purchase price justify a lower TCO?

A higher purchase price justifies a lower TCO when the improvement in quality leads to demonstrably lower costs in other areas — such as less damage, a longer lifespan, reduced maintenance, or more efficient logistics. This is almost always the case with packaging for high-value, sensitive, or regulated products that are shipped frequently.

Specific situations where a higher purchase price pays for itself:

  • High product value: when the contents of a package are worth tens of thousands of dollars, the cost of damage outweighs the price difference between packaging options
  • High usage frequency: for packaging used weekly or daily, a longer lifespan directly translates into fewer replacements and a lower cost per use
  • Strict regulations: in sectors such as defense and medical, UN, NEN, and MIL-STAN standards are mandatory; cheaper packaging that is not compliant introduces legal and operational risks
  • Complex return flows: for international shipments with return logistics, robust, reusable packaging pays off through less failure and fewer replacements in transit
  • Reputational risk: for companies supplying precision instruments or medical devices, a damaged shipment is not just a financial issue — it is also a matter of trust

The general rule is: the higher the value of the contents, the more frequently the packaging is used, and the more demanding the environmental requirements, the stronger the business case for high-quality packaging with a higher purchase price but a lower TCO.

How do you calculate the TCO of industrial packaging step by step?

The TCO of industrial packaging is calculated by adding up all relevant cost items over the expected lifespan of the packaging and dividing by the total number of use cycles. This gives the true cost per use and enables an objective comparison between alternatives.

Follow these steps for a reliable TCO calculation:

  1. Determine the expected lifespan: how many times will the packaging be used before it needs to be replaced? Request this from the supplier or base it on data from comparable applications.
  2. Map all cost items: purchase price, labor costs per use, annual maintenance costs, repair costs, return logistics, and eventual disposal costs.
  3. Estimate the probability and cost of damage: what is the historical or expected likelihood of product damage? Multiply this by the average damage value to calculate the expected damage cost per year.
  4. Add up all costs over the lifespan: sum all items for the full period of use of the packaging.
  5. Divide by the number of use cycles: this gives the TCO per use and makes comparison with alternatives fair and transparent.
  6. Compare multiple options: calculate the TCO for at least two or three alternatives side by side and assess which delivers the lowest total cost.

A practical tip: do not forget to include labor costs in your calculation. If a package takes an average of five extra minutes to pack per shipment and you send three hundred shipments per year, that adds up to twenty-five hours of additional labor annually. Over five years, that is a substantial amount — one that is rarely factored into an initial cost comparison, yet is very much part of the true TCO calculation.

How Faes helps with a complete TCO calculation for your packaging

Faes supports companies in the high-tech, medical, defense, and security sectors in making packaging decisions that go beyond the purchase price. As a full-service packaging partner, Faes maps the complete lifecycle of your packaging solution and helps you calculate the true TCO before you make a decision.

What Faes specifically offers in the context of TCO optimization:

  • Custom engineering: packaging that fits your product and usage frequency precisely, minimizing damage and unnecessary replacement
  • Digital tools: PackAssist and StackAssist support the optimization of packaging design and loading space utilization, directly contributing to lower logistics costs
  • Circular packaging principles: reusable packaging with a corresponding return logistics system for a demonstrably lower TCO per use
  • Compliance expertise: knowledge of UN, NEN, and MIL-STAN standards ensures your packaging meets all regulatory requirements without costly modifications after the fact
  • Full packaging management: from inventory management and return logistics to maintenance and fulfillment, so you can focus on your core business while Faes manages the packaging chain

Want to know what your current packaging solution truly costs and where the opportunities for savings lie? Contact Faes and discover how a smarter packaging choice can structurally reduce your TCO.

Print
Email Download PDF
Michel Prins

Michel Prins

Accountmanager Safety & Security

Michel Prins is Account Manager at Faes and a specialist in Safety & Security. Thanks to his background at the Ministry of Defense and years of experience in the sector, he advises organizations on reliable packaging solutions for critical applications. He combines practical knowledge with technical expertise to package sensitive equipment safely and efficiently.

More articles by Michel Prins

Good packaging doesn’t happen by chance. Using a proven process, our specialists guide you step by step from the initial idea to the final product.

Contact
1
Intake
During an initial consultation, our packaging experts will assess your specific needs. By discussing the requirements the packaging must meet, they can work with our engineers to develop a concept.
2
Concept
Is standard packaging an option, or is custom packaging preferred? This decision is made in consultation with the consultants and designers.
3
Ontwerp
Based on the concept, you’ll receive a tailored proposal. Thanks to our short lines of communication, we can easily make adjustments whenever necessary. Are you satisfied with the recommendation? Then we’ll move forward with developing a prototype.
4
Prototype
Throughout the process, we present concepts digitally and, where necessary, submit 2D drawings for review. You and your project team members can provide feedback or approve them, ensuring that decisions are clearly documented and the review process runs efficiently.
5
Production
Once approval is granted, our experts get to work on producing the packaging. From closures to a fully custom-designed interior: we ensure that all your requirements are carefully incorporated into the final solution.
6
Service
We remain involved even after delivery. We’re happy to take care of all your packaging needs, so you can count on our support for maintenance, modifications, or more complex issues.