Theme:
Why does a low purchase price not always lead to the lowest TCO calculation?
A cheap package can end up costing more — discover how TCO calculation reveals the true costs.
A cheap package can end up costing more — discover how TCO calculation reveals the true costs.
A low purchase price does not automatically lead to the lowest TCO calculation, because the true cost of a packaging solution only becomes clear over its full lifecycle. Maintenance, repairs, replacement, product damage, and logistical inefficiencies all add up and can quickly make a cheap option more expensive than a high-quality investment. In this article, we answer the most frequently asked questions about TCO in industrial packaging.
A TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) calculation includes all costs a packaging solution incurs throughout its entire lifecycle. In addition to the purchase price, this covers costs related to use, maintenance, storage, logistics, repair, replacement, and eventual disposal. For industrial packaging, these hidden costs can far exceed the initial purchase price.
Specifically, a complete TCO calculation for packaging includes the following cost categories:
In sectors such as high-tech, medical, and defense, the damage claims category carries particular weight. A damaged medical device or a defective high-tech component can result in costs that far exceed the purchase price of the packaging many times over. A TCO calculation makes all these hidden costs visible, providing an honest picture of the true investment.
Cheap packaging tends to cost more in the long run because it typically has a shorter lifespan, offers less protection, and generates higher indirect costs. A low purchase price often comes with inferior materials, less precise dimensions, and limited protection against shocks, vibrations, or moisture. The result is more damage, a higher replacement frequency, and increased logistics costs.
In practice, this pattern repeats itself consistently. A cheap, off-the-shelf package that does not fit precisely requires additional filler material or supplementary protection — adding labor time to every shipment. Moreover, cheaper packaging is often designed for single use, meaning you repurchase it with every cycle. Over ten shipments, you pay the purchase price ten times over, whereas a durable, reusable package — despite a higher initial investment — structurally costs less per use.
Indirect damage costs also play a significant role. If a component worth several thousand dollars arrives damaged because the packaging provided insufficient cushioning, the costs of replacement, delays, and reputational damage will far outweigh any savings from choosing cheaper packaging. For companies shipping sensitive equipment or critical components, this is not a theoretical risk — it is a real operational expense.
Reusability significantly reduces total packaging costs by spreading the purchase price across multiple use cycles. The more often a package is reused, the lower the cost per use becomes. For industrial packaging used dozens or even hundreds of times, the cost per cycle drops to a fraction of the initial investment.
The impact of reusability on the TCO calculation operates on several levels:
Reusable packaging does require a well-organized return logistics system to fully realize these benefits. If packages are not systematically retrieved, cleaned, and inspected, part of the cost savings will be lost. A structured management process is therefore a prerequisite for achieving the optimal TCO of reusable industrial packaging.
TCO measures all costs a packaging solution incurs over its lifespan, while ROI (Return on Investment) compares the returns and savings against the investment. TCO answers the question “what does this really cost?”, while ROI answers “what does this deliver relative to what I invest?”.
In packaging decisions, both calculations complement each other. The TCO calculation reveals which option costs the least over the long term. The ROI calculation quantifies what better packaging delivers: fewer damage claims, higher productivity through faster packing and unpacking, less downtime due to damaged shipments, and lower transportation costs through more efficient use of loading space.
A concrete example: a custom package for a medical device costs more than a standard solution. The TCO calculation shows that the custom solution is cheaper over three years due to fewer replacements and zero damage claims. The ROI calculation adds that time savings during packing and avoided downtime from damaged deliveries recover the investment within eighteen months. Together, TCO and ROI provide a complete financial picture of the packaging decision.
A higher purchase price justifies a lower TCO when the improvement in quality leads to demonstrably lower costs in other areas — such as less damage, a longer lifespan, reduced maintenance, or more efficient logistics. This is almost always the case with packaging for high-value, sensitive, or regulated products that are shipped frequently.
Specific situations where a higher purchase price pays for itself:
The general rule is: the higher the value of the contents, the more frequently the packaging is used, and the more demanding the environmental requirements, the stronger the business case for high-quality packaging with a higher purchase price but a lower TCO.
The TCO of industrial packaging is calculated by adding up all relevant cost items over the expected lifespan of the packaging and dividing by the total number of use cycles. This gives the true cost per use and enables an objective comparison between alternatives.
Follow these steps for a reliable TCO calculation:
A practical tip: do not forget to include labor costs in your calculation. If a package takes an average of five extra minutes to pack per shipment and you send three hundred shipments per year, that adds up to twenty-five hours of additional labor annually. Over five years, that is a substantial amount — one that is rarely factored into an initial cost comparison, yet is very much part of the true TCO calculation.
Faes supports companies in the high-tech, medical, defense, and security sectors in making packaging decisions that go beyond the purchase price. As a full-service packaging partner, Faes maps the complete lifecycle of your packaging solution and helps you calculate the true TCO before you make a decision.
What Faes specifically offers in the context of TCO optimization:
Want to know what your current packaging solution truly costs and where the opportunities for savings lie? Contact Faes and discover how a smarter packaging choice can structurally reduce your TCO.
Good packaging doesn’t happen by chance. Using a proven process, our specialists guide you step by step from the initial idea to the final product.